![]() Otherwise it's much faster to just click a button to show the desired doc, rather than have to reopen it again from scratch (uses less battery power too - except in the case of MS Word which seems to use CPU even when "idle" - haven't figured that one out yet). the document is out of date and not used for comparison). I close them if I really do not need them (e.g. Lastly, it's true my taskbar looks messy with two rows of task buttons, but I don't see the advantage of closing and reopening documents or programs if I'm not running out of RAM yet. If that "expert CTO" can't even give an example of one memory hogging program (or show where Windows 7 itself is using so much memory that it's a problem), then it's likely he's full of crap. I don't think my usage can be considered "light", as it is, what are those users running that's using up so much memory? Symantec or McAfee antivirus? ).įWIW, my laptop is not running any of the "OEM crapware" - I did a clean install of Windows 7 months ago when I got the laptop. ![]() ![]() Same thing there - stuck at zero = not swapping. The equivalent in Linux for that is the swap "so" column when you run vmstat 1 (or vmstat 2). If it's not swapping out and not getting "out of memory" messages, it's not low in RAM no matter what some random "expert" thinks. If that's a constant zero when you or the O/S switches from app to app, window to window, it means it's not swapping out. To me the relevant metric for "low on memory" is "Pages Output/sec" (go launch perfmon.msc and add that counter). And so far I haven't had much slowdowns due to low memory issues. Yes it only has 500MB free memory, but so what? The O/S says there's 1700MB available. It's Firefox with a 173MB working set and 142MB Private Working Set! But overall no mem problem.Īnd guess which is using the most RAM? Not Virtual Box, not Word, outlook or Excel. a few Explorer windows open, a few Excel "windows", a few Word windows, one Visio doc, Notepad++, Google Chrome, Firefox, putty, Outlook (a resource hog), Communicator, MSN Messenger windows, a Virtual Box Linux vm machine, Microsoft Security Essentials (it's my work PC so it's supposed to have AV) and it typically says 1700 to 2000MB _available_ (depending on how many firefox tabs, how many word docs and virtual machines etc). There's stuff I don't like about Windows 7 but "memory hog" is not on the list.įor work I'm using Windows 7 64 bit on a 4GB notebook PC with tons of windows open e.g. I don't have low mem problems with Windows 7. It doesn't matter if it averages at 25% or 95%, just that the perfomance overally is better when you utilize all the resources you can to speed up things in general. If theres a sudden need for more RAM, the cached data can be "dropped" in no time. ![]() This doesn't include only files, icons or such, but everything the OS could use or do that takes time. When the things that are most often used are already cached in RAM, their loading works a lot faster. It makes a lot of sense to cache things from hard-drive in low-peak usage points, and in such such way that it doesn't interfere with other perfomance. The new memory models in recent OS's try to utilize all the available RAM (as they should) to speed up things otherwise. I'm actually really surprised, and not in a good way, that "chief technology officer" of the company doesn't know this. The fact that the task manager in Windows says your RAM is used 95% tells nothing, and no it won't "result in slow-downs as the systems were forced to increasingly turn to disk-based virtual memory to handle tasks".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |